Commercial leases often give the landlord the right to accelerate rent through the end of the lease term when the tenant defaults. Acceleration clauses do not usually cause too much controversy in litigation, but there is room for missteps by the landlord.
When a tenant breaches, Florida law generally gives the landlord three options: (i) terminate the lease and retake possession on the landlord’s account; (ii) retake possession on the tenant’s account; and (iii) do nothing and hold the tenant liable for remaining rent under the lease term. Under the first option, the landlord gives up its right to accelerate rent (assuming the lease allows for it). Under the second option, the landlord can accelerate rent if the lease allows for it, but the landlord must try to relet the space and offset accelerated rent with any new rent the landlord collects. Under the third option, the landlord can sue for rent accrued up until the time of the lawsuit or perhaps a summary judgment hearing. For more on these options generally, see here.
In a recent case, a tenant tried to argue that the landlord mis-executed on these optons, but the tenant still lost. In JPAY, Inc. v. 10800 Biscayne Holdings, LLC, the landlord and tenant litigated since 2013 over what rent the tenant, JPAY, owed. JPAY defaulted on rent, and the landlord sued for rent due, but did not ask for accelerated rent. The landlord won summary judgment for rent due through the date of the hearing. JPAY paid off the judgment. The landlord later filed a new summary judgment motion for rent that had accrued since the original judgment. This time the trial court sided with JPAY, ruling that the first judgment was “final,” meaning that the landlord could not seek further unpaid rent in the same lawsuit. So the landlord filed a new lawsuit seeking the rent that had accrued since that judgment. The trial court entered summary judgment for the landlord.
On appeal, JPAY argued that when the landlord sent a default notice and retook possession, the landlord was terminating the lease and retaking possession on the landlord’s account (option 1 above). As a result, the tenant argued, accelerated rent was due at that time, but the landlord didn’t ask for it. The appellate court disagreed because the landlord never gave any indication it was asking accelerated rent in the first or second lawsuits. Had the landlord used language in its filings indicating that it was seeking accelerated rent, the result might have been different.
The appellate court also rejected JPAY’s argument that the judgment in the first lawsuit stopped the landlord from seeking further accrued rent. In the first suit, the landlord sought then-accrued rent and in the second suit, the landlord sought rent that had accrued since the judgment in the first suit. The landlord was suing for something different in the second suit, so it was not precluded by the judgment in the first suit.
Concerns over whether rent was properly accelerated probably do not come up too often in landlord-tenant litigation. But as the JPAY case shows, there are opportunities for landlords to get acceleration wrong.
- Partner
Matt Chait is the Managing Partner of the West Palm Beach office of Shutts & Bowen LLP, where he is a member of the Business Litigation Practice Group. His statewide practice focuses on commercial real estate and land use litigation ...
Search Blog
Follow Us
Recent Posts
- Florida’s New Statutory Home Warranty: What Home Builders Need to Know
- Orange County Proposes Temporary Suspension Ordinance on New Development Applications
- Raising the Roof: The U.S. Department of Labor Announces Rule Raising Salary Thresholds for Overtime Exemptions
- New Guidelines Anticipated Following HHS’s Health Cybersecurity Concept Paper
- SECURE 2.0 and Protecting Your Designated Beneficiaries
- Florida Appellate Court Provides Further Guidance Regarding New Summary Judgment Rule
- Pith? Perfect for Lienors, Not So Much for Landlords: Protecting Rights When Improvements Are Made to Commercial Tenancies
- SEC Adopts New Cybersecurity Rules
- From 😊 to 💼: Can Emojis Create a Legally Binding Contract?
- Florida Employers Subject to E-Verify Law Beginning July 1, 2023
Popular Categories
- Construction
- Construction Litigation
- Business of Real Estate
- Real Estate Law
- Landlord-Tenant
- Cybersecurity
- Employment and Labor
- Development/Land Use
- Intellectual Property
- Data Security
- Construction
- Appeals
- Trusts and Estates
- Litigation
- Contracts
- Supreme Court
- Business
- Privacy
- Technology
- Litigation (Appellate)
- IP Litigation
- Patents
- Health Care
- Business
- Regulatory Compliance
- Florida Government Contracts
- Foreclosures
- Trademark
- Litigation (Labor & Employment)
- Financial Institutions
- Contracting
- Competition
- Compliance
- Property Tax
- Estate planning
- International Dispute Resolution
- Conveyances
- Appellate Blog
- Florida Public Contracts
- Government Contracting
- Government Contracts
- Government
- Lease
- Cyber fraud
- Patent Office
- Insurance
- Wealth planning
- Federal Government Contracting
- Florida Bid Protests
- Public Contracts
- Infringement
- Proposal Writing
- Public Bidding
- GAO
- International Arbitration and Litigation
- Arbitration
- Restrictive Covenants
- International
- Americans with Disabilities Act
- Bid Protest
- Grant Writing
- Copyright
- Title
- Liens
- Small Business
- Promissory Notes
- Consumer Privacy
- Florida Procurement
- Public procurement
- International Arbitration
- PTAB
- General Liability
- Technology
- Liens and encumbrances
- Creditor's Rights
- Attorneys' Fees
- Bidding
- Power Generation
- Inter Partes Review
- Consumer Protection
- Regulation
- Contracting
- Government Vendor
- State Government Contracts
- Venue
- Florida Administrative Law
- Ad Valorem Assessments
- Attorneys' Fees
- Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure
- Bankruptcy
- Florida Public Procurement
- Russia-Related Arbitration
- Eviction
- Mortgages
- Record on Appeal
- FINRA
- Rehearing
- Loan guaranties
- Patents - Assignor Estoppel
- Dispute Resolution
- Statute of limitations
- Statute of repose
- Maritime
- Liens
- Damages
- Briefing
- Department of Labor
- Patents - Obviousness
- Request for Proposal
- Trade Secrets
- Commercial Brokerage
- Bid Writing
- Florida Bidding Strategies
- Renewal
- Attorneys' Fees
- Florida County Lands
- Florida Economic Incentive Packages
- Jury Instructions
- Stay
- Certiorari
- Design Professionals
- Forum Selection
- email hacking
- Offers of Judgment
- Prevailing Party
- Settlements
- Assignment of Contract
- Assignment of Proceeds
- Lis Pendens
- Banking
- Designer Liability
- Finality
- Fintech
- Marketing/Advertising
- Appellate Jurisdiction - Deadlines
- Evidence
- Evidence
- Expert
- Expert Science
- Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure
- Federal Supply Schedule
- Florida Public Records Law
- Mootness
- Preservation
- Public Private Partnership
- Socio-Economic Programs
- Sunshine Law
- Unlicensed Contracting
- Veteran Owned Business
- Partnerships and LLCs
- Homestead
- Standing
Editors
- Partner
- Of Counsel
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Associate
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Senior Associate
- Partner
- Associate
- Partner
- Senior Associate
- Partner
- Associate
- Partner
- Senior Associate
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Of Counsel
- Senior Associate
- Partner
- Associate
- Partner
- Partner
- Associate
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
Archives
- June 2024
- May 2024
- February 2024
- November 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- October 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016