On February 5, 2025, her first day in office, Attorney General Pam Bondi issued two memos explaining steps being taken by the Department of Justice (DOJ) to implement President Trump’s Executive Order 14173 of January 21, 2025 entitled “Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit Based Opportunity.”
The memos observe that the Executive Order provides that policies relating to “diversity, equity, and inclusion” (DEI) and “diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility” (DEIA) “violate” federal civil rights laws and “undermine our national unity.”
Accordingly, the February 5 memo, “Ending Illegal DEI and DEIA Discrimination and Preferences” addresses both private sector employers and educational institutions that receive federal funds. This memo requires the Civil Rights Division and the Office of Legal Policy to submit a report by March 1, 2025 that addresses, among other things, the following:
- The identification of “key sectors of concern.”
- The “most egregious and discriminatory DEI and DEIA practitioners in each section of concern.”
- A plan to deter the use of DEI and DEIA “programs or principles” that constitute illegal discrimination or preferences, including “proposal for criminal investigations and for up to 9 potential civil compliance of investigations of entities meeting the criteria outlined in the executive order. Note, such entities include publicly traded corporations, large non-profit corporations or associations, foundations with assets of $500 million or more, state and local bar and medical associations, and institutions of higher educations with endowments over $1 billion.
- Additional potential litigation activities.
- Other strategies to end “illegal DEI and DEIA discrimination.”
The second February 5 memo, “Eliminating Internal Discriminatory Practices,” directs all DOJ components to evaluate consent decrees, settlement agreements, litigation positions, grants or similar funding mechanisms, procurements, internal policies and guidance, and contracting arrangement” for compliance with the Executive Order, and rescinds and orders replaced any materials that “encouraged or permitted race- or sex-based preferences.” Further, any such updated preference is to narrow the use of “disparate impact” theories and emphasize that “statistical disparities alone do not automatically constitute unlawful discrimination.”
By March 15, 2025, each DOJ component is to submit a report to the Attorney General that: (1) confirms the termination of all DEI, DEIA and environmental justice programs, offices, and positions (including “chief diversity officers” or similar positions); (2) identifies agency or department DEI. DEIA or environmental justice positions, committees, programs, services, activities, budgets, and expenditures in existence on November 4, 2024 and whether they have been ”misleadingly relabeled;” (3) identifies federal contractors, suppliers, vendors, and grantees who have provided DEI training or DEI training materials to agency or department employees since January 20, 2021; (4) identifies federal grantees who received federal funding to provide or advance DEI, DEIA or environmental justice programs, services or activities since January 20, 2021; (5) assesses the operational impact (number of New “DEI hires”) and cost of prior administration’s DEI, DEIA and environmental justice programs and policies, and (6) recommends actions to align all aspects of the DOJ with “requirement of equal dignity and respect.”
This second memo also notes that, in preparing these reports, DOJ components should pay particular attention to ending any references to DEI and DEIA, including references to “unconscious bias,” “cultural sensitivity,” “inclusive leadership,” and any emphasis on “race- or sex-based criteria rather than merit.”
In a footnote, both memos note that they do not prohibit educational, cultural, or historical observances such as Black History Month, International Holocaust Remembrance Day, or similar events that “celebrate diversity, recognize historical contributions, and promote awareness without engaging in exclusion or discrimination.”
As explained above, the DOJ, under Attorney General Pam Bondi, has issued directives to implement President Trump’s Executive Order on DEI, targeting policies deemed discriminatory. It is important for businesses to consult their attorney to understand the implications of these changes and ensure compliance. For more information, please consult with labor and employment counsel or reach out to blog author Mary Ruth Houston or any member of the Shutts Labor and Employment Practice Group.
- Partner
Mary Ruth Houston is Co-Managing Partner of the Orlando office and Chair of the firm’s Labor & Employment Law Practice Group. She is certified as a mediator in Florida courts and the Middle District of Florida. She was selected as ...
Search Blog
Follow Us
Recent Posts
- DOJ Issues Directives on DEI
- Trump Executive Order Rescinds EO 11246 Regarding Affirmative Action for Contractors on Federal Projects
- Recent Florida Court Decision Provides Important Lesson on Construction Defect Damages
- Construction Contractors Should Prepare for the Effects of Potential New Tariffs on Construction Material Prices and Availability
- Federal Court Strikes Down the DOL’s Increased Salary Thresholds for Executive, Administrative, Professional, And Highly Compensated Employee Overtime Exemptions
- Breaking News: FinCEN Postpones Beneficial Ownership Reporting Deadlines for Companies Impacted by Recent Major Storms
- What You Need to Know About the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Build America TIFIA Loan
- Breaking News: Federal Judge Blocks Nationwide Implementation of the FTC’s New Rule Banning Noncompete Agreements
- September 4th is Almost Here: How Employers Can Prepare for the Upcoming Effective Date of the FTC’s Non-Compete Rule
- Florida’s New Statutory Home Warranty: What Home Builders Need to Know
Popular Categories
- Employment and Labor
- Construction
- Litigation
- Construction
- DEI
- Construction Litigation
- Litigation (Labor & Employment)
- Landlord-Tenant
- Business of Real Estate
- Real Estate Law
- Cybersecurity
- Intellectual Property
- Competition
- Appeals
- Department of Labor
- Contracts
- Trusts and Estates
- Business
- Supreme Court
- Data Security
- Development/Land Use
- IP Litigation
- Public Private Partnership
- Technology
- Patents
- Salary
- Litigation (Appellate)
- Privacy
- Business
- Regulatory Compliance
- Florida Government Contracts
- Foreclosures
- Trademark
- Contracting
- Public Finance
- Compliance
- Financial Institutions
- Estate planning
- Health Care
- International Dispute Resolution
- Florida Public Contracts
- Government Contracting
- Government Contracts
- Government
- Lease
- Conveyances
- Property Tax
- Patent Office
- Appellate Blog
- Insurance
- Wealth planning
- Federal Government Contracting
- Florida Bid Protests
- Public Contracts
- Infringement
- Cyber fraud
- Proposal Writing
- Public Bidding
- GAO
- Bid Protest
- Americans with Disabilities Act
- International
- Arbitration
- Grant Writing
- International Arbitration and Litigation
- Restrictive Covenants
- Copyright
- Promissory Notes
- Title
- Small Business
- Florida Procurement
- Public procurement
- PTAB
- General Liability
- Technology
- Consumer Privacy
- International Arbitration
- Liens and encumbrances
- Creditor's Rights
- Liens
- Bidding
- Attorneys' Fees
- Inter Partes Review
- Venue
- Consumer Protection
- Regulation
- Contracting
- Government Vendor
- State Government Contracts
- Ad Valorem Assessments
- Florida Administrative Law
- Power Generation
- Attorneys' Fees
- Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure
- Bankruptcy
- Florida Public Procurement
- Mortgages
- Russia-Related Arbitration
- Record on Appeal
- FINRA
- Rehearing
- Loan guaranties
- Eviction
- Patents - Assignor Estoppel
- Statute of limitations
- Statute of repose
- Dispute Resolution
- Liens
- Damages
- Maritime
- Briefing
- Patents - Obviousness
- Request for Proposal
- Commercial Brokerage
- Trade Secrets
- Bid Writing
- Florida Bidding Strategies
- Renewal
- Attorneys' Fees
- Florida County Lands
- Florida Economic Incentive Packages
- Jury Instructions
- Stay
- Certiorari
- Design Professionals
- Forum Selection
- email hacking
- Offers of Judgment
- Prevailing Party
- Settlements
- Assignment of Contract
- Assignment of Proceeds
- Designer Liability
- Finality
- Lis Pendens
- Appellate Jurisdiction - Deadlines
- Banking
- Evidence
- Evidence
- Expert
- Expert Science
- Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure
- Fintech
- Marketing/Advertising
- Preservation
- Unlicensed Contracting
- Federal Supply Schedule
- Florida Public Records Law
- Mootness
- Socio-Economic Programs
- Sunshine Law
- Veteran Owned Business
- Homestead
- Partnerships and LLCs
- Standing
Editors
- Of Counsel
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Associate
- Partner
- Partner
- Associate
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Senior Associate
- Partner
- Associate
- Partner
- Senior Associate
- Partner
- Associate
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Of Counsel
- Senior Associate
- Partner
- Associate
- Partner
- Partner
- Associate
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
Archives
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- February 2024
- November 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- October 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016