In Genesis Ministries, Inc. v. Brown, Case No. 1D15-1310 (Fla. 1st DCA February 16, 2016), the First District Court of Appeal held that a challenge to a property tax lien does not need to be filed within 60 days of the certification of the tax roll.
Genesis Ministries had enjoyed a religious use exemption from ad valorem assessments on its property from 2005 through 2012. In 2013, the Santa Rosa County Property Appraiser recorded a tax lien against the property stating that Genesis was not entitled to the exemption and owed $298,000, which included penalties. In August 2014, after selling the property, Genesis paid off the tax lien under protest and subsequently filed suit. The property appraiser moved to dismiss on the grounds that the claim was barred by Section 194.171(2), Florida Statutes. As relevant here, that statute requires suits “to contest a tax assessment” to be filed no later than “60 days from the date the assessment being contested is certified for collection under s. 193.122(2).” The trial court granted the motion to dismiss.
In reversing the trial court’s decision, the First DCA noted that the Florida Supreme Court has previously held that the 60 day deadline is deemed to apply “broadly.” See Ward v. Brown, 894 So. 2d 811, 812 (Fla. 2004). Nevertheless, the court ruled that the plain language of Section 194.171(2) does not pertain to actions contesting tax liens, but rather only to actions contesting “a tax assessment.” The court stated that challenges to tax assessments are based on the certification of the tax roll, which is why that event triggers the deadline to file suit. By contrast, the court found, the tax lien at issue was not based on the certification of the tax roll, but rather the property appraiser’s “retrospective determination under section 196.011(9)(a) that Genesis was not entitled to the tax exemption it received from 2005 to 2012.” The First DCA further noted that applying the 60 day deadline to challenges to tax liens would require adding additional language to the statute in order for it to facially apply to such challenges. The court recognized that it does not have that power.
Finally, the court stated that due process concerns weighed against applying the 60 day deadline to challenges to tax liens. A taxpayer has the ability to challenge an assessment (or denial of an exemption) with the value adjustment board before the tax roll is certified. There is no equivalent administrative review right with respect to the recording of a tax lien. Therefore, the court held, if the 60 day deadline applied to challenges to tax liens, a taxpayer’s only right to challenge the lien would be in the 60 day period. Given that the property appraiser is not required to give the taxpayer actual notice of the tax lien, a taxpayer would be required to repeatedly check the public records to see if a lien had been recorded. The court doubted “that the Legislature intended such a draconian result.”
Genesis also challenged the denial of the exemption for 2013, but that part of the case involved different issues than 2005-2012 and is not addressed in this post.
- Partner
Matt Chait is the Managing Partner of the West Palm Beach office of Shutts & Bowen LLP, where he is a member of the Business Litigation Practice Group. His statewide practice focuses on commercial real estate and land use litigation ...
Search Blog
Follow Us
Recent Posts
- Florida’s New Statutory Home Warranty: What Home Builders Need to Know
- Orange County Proposes Temporary Suspension Ordinance on New Development Applications
- SECURE 2.0 and Protecting Your Designated Beneficiaries
- Florida Appellate Court Provides Further Guidance Regarding New Summary Judgment Rule
- SEC Adopts New Cybersecurity Rules
- From 😊 to 💼: Can Emojis Create a Legally Binding Contract?
- HB-3: An Overview of ESG Factors Relating to Public Funds Investment and Financial Industry Impacts
- The Live Local Act Part 2 - Affordable Housing Incentives
- Florida's Live Local Act
- Taking an Appeal to Florida’s New Sixth District Court of Appeal? Three Local Rules You Need to Know
Popular Categories
- Business of Real Estate
- Real Estate Law
- Construction
- Construction Litigation
- Development/Land Use
- Landlord-Tenant
- Trusts and Estates
- Appeals
- Contracts
- Litigation
- Litigation (Appellate)
- Business
- Foreclosures
- Florida Government Contracts
- Property Tax
- Estate planning
- Supreme Court
- Conveyances
- Appellate Blog
- Cyber fraud
- Technology
- Lease
- Wealth planning
- Government
- Florida Bid Protests
- Government Contracts
- Business
- Insurance
- Proposal Writing
- Public Bidding
- Public Contracts
- GAO
- Restrictive Covenants
- Grant Writing
- Bid Protest
- Title
- Cybersecurity
- Data Security
- Promissory Notes
- Construction
- Regulatory Compliance
- Liens and encumbrances
- Creditor's Rights
- Government Contracting
- Florida Public Contracts
- Small Business
- Bidding
- Compliance
- Americans with Disabilities Act
- Federal Government Contracting
- Florida Administrative Law
- Public procurement
- Ad Valorem Assessments
- Attorneys' Fees
- Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure
- Florida Procurement
- Bankruptcy
- Eviction
- Mortgages
- Record on Appeal
- Rehearing
- Loan guaranties
- Attorneys' Fees
- Employment and Labor
- Litigation (Labor & Employment)
- Consumer Protection
- Regulation
- Maritime
- Briefing
- Request for Proposal
- Commercial Brokerage
- Bid Writing
- Florida Bidding Strategies
- Renewal
- Florida Public Procurement
- Attorneys' Fees
- Florida County Lands
- Florida Economic Incentive Packages
- Jury Instructions
- Stay
- Certiorari
- email hacking
- Assignment of Contract
- Assignment of Proceeds
- State Government Contracts
- Lis Pendens
- Appellate Jurisdiction - Deadlines
- Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure
- Finality
- Preservation
- Technology
- Evidence
- Expert
- Federal Supply Schedule
- Florida Public Records Law
- Government Vendor
- Mootness
- Public Private Partnership
- Socio-Economic Programs
- Sunshine Law
- Veteran Owned Business
- Homestead
- Partnerships and LLCs
- Standing
Editors
- Of Counsel
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Associate
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Associate
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Of Counsel
- Senior Associate
- Associate
- Partner
- Partner
Archives
- June 2024
- May 2024
- November 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- October 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- November 2018
- October 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016