The Live Local Act (SB 102) (the “Act”) amends multiple provisions of the Florida Statutes with the overarching purpose of spurring additional development of affordable housing in the State. Importantly, for qualifying affordable housing projects, the Act preempts local zoning codes and comprehensive plans with regard to height, density and use. Other provisions of the Act provide tax and financial incentives to foster affordable housing in the State. The Act goes into effect on July 1, 2023, except for certain provisions pertaining to tax exemptions that are set to take effect on January 1, 2024.
What Constitutes “Affordable” Housing under the Act?
Rental housing is “affordable” under Florida law if: (i) it is restricted to households not making more than a specified percentage of the area median income (“AMI”), adjusted for family size, and (ii) the monthly rents (including utilities) do not exceed 30 percent of the tenant’s income. There are four levels of affordability thresholds that are targeted by different provisions of the Act: at or below 30% of AMI (“Extremely Low-Income”), at or below 50% of AMI (“Very Low-Income”), at or below 80% of AMI (“Low-Income”), and at or below 120% AMI (“Moderate-Income”).
Some of the most significant aspects of the Act – including the land use and zoning preemption discussed in Section I below – seek to incentivize the development of units rented to tenants at or below 120% AMI. For reference, 120% of AMI in Miami-Dade County for 2022 was $81,960 for an individual and $117,000 for a family of four. The maximum rents (including a utility allowance) that could be charged to such a Moderate-Income tenant in Miami-Dade would be approximately $2,049 for the individual, or $2,925 for the family of four. The fact that the Act targets this Moderate-Income level is notable as most existing programs in Florida target the other, lower income categories of affordable housing.
An overview of the Act is set forth below.
I. Land Use and Zoning Incentives for Eligible Projects
A. The “40% Rule” (effective July 1, 2023, and expiring October 1, 2033)
For a development whose residential units consist of at least 40% affordable rental units (with tenants at or below 120% AMI) for a period of at least 30 years (the “40% Rule”), a county/municipality:
- Must authorize multi-family and mixed-use residential (where at least 65% of the total square footage is used for residential purposes) in any area zoned for commercial, industrial,[1] or mixed uses.
- May not limit density of a development below the highest residential density allowed in the jurisdiction.
- May not restrict the height below (i) the highest height allowed for either commercial or residential development within the jurisdiction within one mile of the proposed development or (ii) three stories, whichever is higher.
- May not require zoning or land use changes, special exceptions or conditional use approvals, variances, or comprehensive plan amendments for height, zoning or density under the Act.
- Must administratively approve the proposed project – without public hearings – if the zoning code and comprehensive plan provisions applicable to multifamily development in areas zoned for that use are met (including, but not limited to, setbacks and parking) except for density, height, and land use.
- Must “consider” reduced parking for developments meeting the 40% Rule, to the extent such development is within ½ mile of a major transit stop (as that term may be defined in the local government’s laws).
There are a few additional important points worth noting:
- Many affordable housing laws require projects to have a mix of AMI limits for the affordable housing units (e.g., some units must be 60% AMI, some 80% AMI and the rest at market). Under the 40% Rule, all of the affordable units can be at 120% AMI.
- There is no requirement relating to the location of the affordable units within a project or on the type of affordable residential unit (e.g., studio vs. 1 bedroom). For example, in a 20 story tower, all affordable units could be located on floors 1-4 with the market rate units above.
- While the affordable units must be offered for rent, there is no prohibition on having the market rate units be “for sale” condominium units.
B. The “10% Rule”
Notwithstanding any other law or local ordinance to the contrary, a county/municipality is now allowed to approve a residential development (or a mixed-use residential development) on any parcel that is zoned for commercial or industrial use, so long as at least 10% of the units included are affordable. Unlike the 40% Rule above, this section is permissive, providing the local government the option to approve a development that complies with the 10% Rule.
II. Four New Ad Valorem Tax Exemptions
- 75% ad valorem tax exemption for projects that provide at least 70 units dedicated to those earning between 80-120% AMI. The exemption applies only to the affordable units, and applies for the 2024-2059 tax years.
- 100% ad valorem tax exemption for projects that provide at least 70 units dedicated to those below 80% AMI. The exemption applies only to the affordable units, and applies for the 2024-2059 tax years.
- 100% ad valorem tax exemption for any land owned entirely by a charitable entity qualified pursuant to 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code and in compliance with applicable IRS regulations and which is leased for at least 99 years for the purpose of providing affordable housing, and is predominantly used for such housing. This exemption applies for the 2024-2059 tax years.
- Counties may now adopt an additional exemption for properties containing 50 or more units, with at least 20% of units being set aside for those earning not more than 60% AMI and rent restricted. This section first applies to the 2024 taxable year, and can remain in effect for so long as the county elects to keep it active (requiring an affirmative vote once every four years).
III. Sales Tax Exemption for Building Materials Used for Affordable Housing
The Act provides a new sales tax exemption for building materials used for the development of a newly constructed affordable housing unit. After the unit is substantially completed, the refund is obtained via application to the Florida Department of Revenue. In the event that the building materials are paid for out of grant proceeds, the refund belongs to the government. The refund is calculated on a per-unit basis and is capped at either $5000 or 97.5% of sales or use tax paid, whichever is less.
IV. Expedited Building Permitting and Development Orders
Local governments must now maintain on their websites the policy and procedures for expedited building permitting and development orders applicable to affordable housing.
V. Prohibition on Rent Control
The Act prohibits local governments from imposing rent controls. This was previously permitted by Section 125.0103, Florida Statutes.
VII. Additional Funding Allocated to Affordable Housing Programs
- Over $700 million in funding for numerous existing affordable housing programs for fiscal years 2022-2023 and 2023-2024:
- State Housing Initiatives Partnership program (“SHIP”) – $252 million
- Funds are disbursed from the Florida Housing Finance Corporation (“FHFC”) to the local governments, which then make them available to developers who comply with the program’s requirements.
- State Apartment Incentive Loan program (“SAIL”) - $259 million
- Funds are made available to developers through competitive solicitations administered by FHFC.
- Hometown Hero Housing Program - $100 million
- Makes homeownership affordable for eligible frontline community workers such as law enforcement officers, firefighters, educators, healthcare professionals, childcare employees, and active military or veterans.
- Construction Housing Inflation Response Program (“CHIRP”)- $100 million
- Funds are made available to developers through competitive solicitations administered by FHFC.
- Additional Funding for the State Housing Trust Fund
- Redirects up to $150 million annually to this trust fund over the next 10 years.
- At least 70% of funds to be made available to developers through competitive solicitations administered by FHFC.
- State Housing Initiatives Partnership program (“SHIP”) – $252 million
- New Live Local Corporate Tax Donation Program:
- New tax donation program allowing taxpayers to get tax credits against corporate or insurance premium tax liability by paying directly to FHFC. Capped at $100 million annually.
[1] This does not apply to property zoned industrial that is defined as recreational or commercial working waterfront in Section 342.201(2)(b), Florida Statutes.
- Partner
Alexander I. Tachmes is a partner in the Miami office of Shutts & Bowen LLP, where he is Firm-Wide Chair of the Land Use Practice Group and a member of the Real Estate Practice Group.
A Martindale-Hubbell AV® rated attorney, Alex ...
Search Blog
Follow Us
Recent Posts
- Federal Court Strikes Down the DOL’s Increased Salary Thresholds for Executive, Administrative, Professional, And Highly Compensated Employee Overtime Exemptions
- Breaking News: FinCEN Postpones Beneficial Ownership Reporting Deadlines for Companies Impacted by Recent Major Storms
- What You Need to Know About the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Build America TIFIA Loan
- Breaking News: Federal Judge Blocks Nationwide Implementation of the FTC’s New Rule Banning Noncompete Agreements
- September 4th is Almost Here: How Employers Can Prepare for the Upcoming Effective Date of the FTC’s Non-Compete Rule
- Florida’s New Statutory Home Warranty: What Home Builders Need to Know
- Orange County Proposes Temporary Suspension Ordinance on New Development Applications
- Raising the Roof: The U.S. Department of Labor Announces Rule Raising Salary Thresholds for Overtime Exemptions
- New Guidelines Anticipated Following HHS’s Health Cybersecurity Concept Paper
- SECURE 2.0 and Protecting Your Designated Beneficiaries
Popular Categories
- Employment and Labor
- Litigation (Labor & Employment)
- Construction
- Department of Labor
- Business of Real Estate
- Landlord-Tenant
- Salary
- Construction Litigation
- Real Estate Law
- Competition
- Cybersecurity
- Intellectual Property
- Appeals
- Construction
- Contracts
- Litigation
- Public Private Partnership
- Trusts and Estates
- Data Security
- Development/Land Use
- Business
- Supreme Court
- Technology
- Privacy
- IP Litigation
- Litigation (Appellate)
- Patents
- Public Finance
- Business
- Regulatory Compliance
- Florida Government Contracts
- Foreclosures
- Trademark
- Health Care
- Contracting
- Financial Institutions
- Compliance
- Estate planning
- International Dispute Resolution
- Property Tax
- Florida Public Contracts
- Government Contracting
- Government Contracts
- Government
- Conveyances
- Lease
- Appellate Blog
- Patent Office
- Insurance
- Wealth planning
- Federal Government Contracting
- Florida Bid Protests
- Public Contracts
- Infringement
- Cyber fraud
- Proposal Writing
- Public Bidding
- GAO
- Bid Protest
- International Arbitration and Litigation
- Americans with Disabilities Act
- Arbitration
- International
- Restrictive Covenants
- Grant Writing
- Copyright
- Promissory Notes
- Title
- Small Business
- Florida Procurement
- Public procurement
- Consumer Privacy
- PTAB
- General Liability
- Technology
- International Arbitration
- Liens and encumbrances
- Liens
- Creditor's Rights
- Bidding
- Attorneys' Fees
- Inter Partes Review
- Consumer Protection
- Power Generation
- Regulation
- Venue
- Contracting
- Government Vendor
- State Government Contracts
- Ad Valorem Assessments
- Florida Administrative Law
- Attorneys' Fees
- Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure
- Bankruptcy
- Florida Public Procurement
- Russia-Related Arbitration
- Mortgages
- FINRA
- Record on Appeal
- Eviction
- Rehearing
- Loan guaranties
- Patents - Assignor Estoppel
- Statute of limitations
- Statute of repose
- Dispute Resolution
- Liens
- Maritime
- Damages
- Briefing
- Patents - Obviousness
- Request for Proposal
- Trade Secrets
- Commercial Brokerage
- Bid Writing
- Florida Bidding Strategies
- Renewal
- Attorneys' Fees
- Florida County Lands
- Florida Economic Incentive Packages
- Jury Instructions
- Stay
- Certiorari
- Design Professionals
- Forum Selection
- email hacking
- Offers of Judgment
- Prevailing Party
- Settlements
- Assignment of Contract
- Assignment of Proceeds
- Designer Liability
- Lis Pendens
- Appellate Jurisdiction - Deadlines
- Banking
- Evidence
- Evidence
- Expert
- Expert Science
- Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure
- Finality
- Fintech
- Marketing/Advertising
- Preservation
- Unlicensed Contracting
- Federal Supply Schedule
- Florida Public Records Law
- Mootness
- Socio-Economic Programs
- Sunshine Law
- Veteran Owned Business
- Homestead
- Partnerships and LLCs
- Standing
Editors
- Of Counsel
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Associate
- Partner
- Partner
- Associate
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Senior Associate
- Partner
- Associate
- Partner
- Senior Associate
- Partner
- Associate
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Of Counsel
- Senior Associate
- Partner
- Associate
- Partner
- Partner
- Associate
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
Archives
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- February 2024
- November 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- October 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016